Link
Am I the only one who finds his statement about the London bombings offensive?
It's like I said -- 40 people dead, 150 seriously wounded, 1,000 wounded, out of over 1 million people in that transit tube. It's not a successful terrorist attack, folks.
So, if that wasn't a 'successfuk' attack, what is? Are there guidelines about what constitutes a 'successful' attack versus an 'unsuccessful' one?
Pull you head out of your arse, Rush. People DIED. People were INJURED. It's not about how big it was or how many people didn't die. Terrorism is terrorism, regardless of the scale. To me, an unsuccessful attack would be one where bombs didn't detonate, or where the bombers were caught before they could complete their plan.
Londoners and Englishmen will prevail, they will not be intimidated so in that respect the terrorists didn't get what they had hoped for....but to make statments like that almost belittling the incident....
....that's just disrespectful.