Knitting. Yarn. Fiber artistry. More knitting. Nursing school. Hospice work. Death and the dying process. Phoenix Raven's. Knitting. Yarn. Oh, and Life As An Air Force Wife.
Published on November 21, 2006 By dharmagrl In Current Events

My local paper has been running a series of articles on DCFS and how it's failing to protect children in the area.  I've been reading with horror about children who were left with abusive parents and who were subsequently either killed or damaged for life by these monsters posing as parents - but what horrified me even more was the fact that NONE of the DCFS workers who fell down on the job were fired.  NONE.  The worst that happened to one of them was a 9 day suspension - and that particular worker had been suspended SIX times before. 

The following is just a sampling of the tales of horror that were in the paper the past few days:

Boy, 6 weeks old. Died before 2003 after being shaken by his father

A DCFS child protection investigator used an incorrect birthdate when running a criminal check on the father. This resulted in a false "clean" report. The father actually had two convictions for drugs and domestic violence and arrests for disorderly conduct, resisting arrest and obstruction of justice. The caseworker determined the boy was not in danger. "She based this belief on the mother's self-serving statement that when she told the father to stop hitting the child, he stopped," the inspector general's report stated.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: The caseworker and investigator received counseling.

Boy, 21/2 Died prior to 2003 after being shaken by his mother's boyfriend.

Patrons in a bowling alley witnessed the boyfriend kicking the boy, who cowered under a coat. Police arrested the boyfriend. But a DCFS investigator closed the case as "unfounded" without checking the police report from the bowling alley episode, failing to obtain medical records from the hospital or interviewing anyone from the bowling alley. He relied on the mother's word that no abuse occurred.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: The agency suspended the investigator for five days. His supervisor received a five-day "paper suspension."

Boy, 1. Died prior to 2002 of a beating from his mother's boyfriend.

A DCFS child protection investigator reported that drug addiction was not an issue in the family, even though the inspector general later found the mother had been arrested 48 times, including several drug arrests and three felony convictions. At one point, the boy, who suffered from asthma, was choking. The inebriated mother flagged down a motorist to take the boy to an emergency room, then wandered off, leaving him there. The DCFS investigator interpreted this as a positive sign -- that she sought medical help -- and ended the investigation. The boy died of a beating about two months later.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: None

Boy, 9, and girl 16.

Died prior to 2002

These children died after acute asthma attacks while living in separate foster homes. Private agency caseworkers failed to make any mention of asthma in either child's case file. Caseworkers did not have an Asthma Action Plan, even though the boy had been identified by the Department of Public Aid as one of the top 200 users of asthma medication in the state.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: None

Boy, 1. Died prior to 2002 of blunt force to the head by an unknown assailant. After a call to the state child abuse hot line, a DCFS child protection investigator and his supervisor spoke to friends and relatives but failed to confirm the mother's address so that the boy and a sibling could be located and examined. They ended their child abuse investigation as unfounded "without having observed the children."

DCFS DISCIPLINE: The investigator and his supervisor received discipline.

Girl, 4 months old, Cook County. Died in February 2002

The girl died after her father stuffed a washcloth down her throat. The DCFS became involved with the family earlier after the child was scalded. But DCFS workers closed the case without assessing the danger in the house by properly investigating the father's statement that the scalding was an accident -- a claim that officials later proved false. A DCFS investigator told the inspector general the water temperature could not be measured because he wasn't provided batteries for his state-supplied thermometer.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: None

Boy, 5 months old. Died prior to 2001 of a beating by his father.

An inexperienced therapist employed by a private agency used by DCFS found nothing wrong, despite the boy's bruising. But at a staff meeting the next day, a supervisor told the therapist to immediately re-examine the boy. When the therapist got to the house, the father said his son was sleeping. "Concerned about upsetting the father," the therapist left without seeing the child. An hour later, the father called 911. The boy was pronounced dead in the emergency room.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: None

Girl, 11, of Cook County. Died in February 2001

A supervisor told a DCFS child protection investigator to take a number of steps to make sure the child received her medication for seizures. Instead, she ignored the case for 48 days and then closed the investigation after talking to the mother once on the telephone. The investigator never contacted the girl's doctor or a local police officer who responded to the home when the girl had collapsed earlier. The DCFS investigator also took the mother's word that she could not always afford the girl's seizure medication, although the inspector general later learned that insurance covered the entire cost. The girl suffered a seizure and drowned in a bathtub eight months after DCFS ended the investigation.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: The investigator received a 10-day suspension. The investigator's supervisor received counseling.

Boy, 2 months old, Cook County. Died Jan. 1, 2000

On New Year's Eve, while smoking crack, the mother took refuge from celebratory gunfire by hiding in a kitchen cabinet with her son, where she continued to smoke crack cocaine. The baby died from cocaine asphyxiation. The mother received a 10-year prison sentence. Previously, a DCFS caseworker broke regulations when she informed the mother of the dates of "random" drug testing. "The worker did not understand that the advance notice she gave rendered the tests useless," an investigative report stated.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: None

Boy, 5 months old. Died prior to 2000 at home of undetermined causes.

The baby's mentally ill, drug-addicted mother left the baby boy alone for two days. She had given birth to three children, all of whom tested positive for cocaine and syphilis. The mother had attempted suicide at least three times, including one attempt to self-abort her first child by drinking bleach. Rather than developing a plan to assure the 5-month old's safety, DCFS accepted the mother's statement that she "intended to rely upon a casual network of relatives to ensure her son was cared for," the inspector general reported. Authorities placed the mother in an independent living program with limited supervision, where the boy died. "The agency's lack of critical thinking points to the problem of a 'one size fits all' approach to independent living programs," the report concluded.

DCFS DISCIPLINE: None

Girl, 17, Cook County. Died prior to 2000 -- Someone raped and killed this mentally handicapped girl from a rural area after authorities sent her to an independent living program in Chicago. After officials discovered that she was having sexual relations with numerous men, they decided she needed a worker with her around the clock. On the night she was killed, the girl left the group home without the worker. The inspector general determined "she should never have been placed in an independent living program."

DCFS DISCIPLINE: Two caseworkers received counseling.

Two metro east children are the subjects of pending office of the inspector general reports that are expected to be published in January. They are not included in the 53 deaths examined by the newspaper:

Natoria Mickens, 2 months old, Cahokia, Died Dec. 1, 2002

Christopher Mickens shook his daughter, Natoria, to death. The DCFS had been involved with the family since 1999 after the father was suspected of causing serious injury to his then 33-day-old daughter, Christyuna. State workers allowed Mickens to remain in the home. In 2004, Mickens pleaded guilty to involuntary manslaughter in Natoria's death and received nine years in prison.

Lausandra Davis, 2 months old, Carlyle. Died January 2002

Lausandra choked to death on a ribbon tied to a pacifier. However, an autopsy showed an unreported and healed fracture of the tibia, the largest bone below the knee. Police investigated but brought no charges. The mother first came to the attention of the DCFS in 1998 when she left her children unattended in a locked car.

I sat and read these stories with tears in my eyes.  I am just disgusted, not only with the parents and abusers of these poor little souls, but with the people who were paid to protect them.  It seems that DCFS are either sticking their noses in where they are not needed and removing children unneccessarily or they're letting kids go back to abusive families and, ultimately, to their deaths.

It's sickening.  Truly.


Comments
on Nov 21, 2006
It's sickening. Truly.


I agree, dharma. This is one reason I think we need to do something to stop the spurious and vengeful investigations...because supervisors spend time chasing nothing while the true cases of abuse do not get the time and attention they deserve.


on Nov 21, 2006
I have not seen as much, but I have seen enough.  That is why I am so pro Gideon in this.
on Nov 21, 2006
because supervisors spend time chasing nothing while the true cases of abuse do not get the time and attention they deserve.


Yep! They don't do what they're supposed to be doing. People who want to adopt children go through so much crap and have to be the ones doing their own follow ups sometimes!


It sickens me too to read this. There's no excuse for this, none at all!
on Nov 21, 2006
Clearly the system is both over burdened, and insufficiently funded, and the penalties for filing of false reports not stiff enough.
on Nov 22, 2006
Another thing I hear about on a personal level, not sure how this carries over to the rest of the system, but locally, some of the social workers/case workers do 10-12 hour days, instead of 8 hour days, and have to take extra time off, leave of absences to deal with the emotional stresses.

It's really sad, that children and families are being broken up and falling apart in our country, when we have so many resources to see other things though, exploration of space, building up of nuclear weapons stockpiles, all the entertainment excesses.

Eisenhower had it right when he said "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."

One could carry that over and apply it to those who are being abused by their own family for one reason or another.

One of the most dangerous problems with families at least rapidly increasing in my state is Crystal-Meth. The addiction of this stuff is supposedly so intense as to be nearly always unbreakable, making it doesn't require an import from another country, only lots of cold medications, meth labs in houses can explode leveling a house, and users hit as often as daily or more.

The users quickly over a period of months to a year or two begin to focus only on meth, at the expense of their brain, emotions, will to do anything except get high, loose teeth, neglect their children obviously.

This seems to be a hot new drug in the rural areas, but it is spreading urban and unfortunately is going to make for a new drug war pretty soon if more options on how to stop this aren't explored.
on Nov 22, 2006

This is one reason I think we need to do something to stop the spurious and vengeful investigations...because supervisors spend time chasing nothing while the true cases of abuse do not get the time and attention they deserve.

I agree.  You and I have both been victims of false reports made by neighbors or other people in the community who don't have the best interests of our children at heart, but who make reports simply out of spite - because they don't like us.  How, though, do we determine that the reports were made out of spite and not out of genuine concern?  That's the rub.

I have not seen as much, but I have seen enough.

As have I.

There's no excuse for this, none at all!

Nope, there isn't.  These DCFS agents have the blood of those babies and children on their hands - I hope that they can sleep at night, knowing what their actions (or lack of actions) led to.  These kids weren't killed instantly, most of them suffered terribly, and in some cases they never knew anything but pain and fear their whole lives.  If I were responsible for something like that I don't know that I could handle living with myself.

Clearly the system is both over burdened, and insufficiently funded, and the penalties for filing of false reports not stiff enough.

I don't know that they're even being enforced - the penalties, I mean - because it's so difficult to prove that someone made a false report maliciously. 

 

little-whip

I know. 

One of the most dangerous problems with families at least rapidly increasing in my state is Crystal-Meth.

That's been a menace in most states for years.  Even my MIL who lives in a quiet little Indiana town was finding empty drain cleaner bottles and Sudafed boxes in the alley behind her house three or four years ago.  It's not always drugs that lead to these children being killed, though.  

on Nov 22, 2006

True Karen, it seems that failure is a career enhancer with DCFS and most government positioins.

 

Eisenhower had it right when he said "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed."

What a stupid thing for any leader to say.  We eat, clothe and stay warm through INCOME not government revenues.  I guess Eisenhower turned over the excess of his government paychecks to prove he wasn't a thief.

on Nov 22, 2006
They're a typical government agency. Inefficient, poorly managed, and lacking in any real accountability.
on Nov 26, 2006
"It's not always drugs that lead to these children being killed, though."

I agree, but a lot of child neglect, and abuse is tied to drug abuse/use, meth with is addicting qualties, and ease of production as well as dependency rates being so high, it certainly is a huge factor in importing children into the foster homes, either because their parents are in treatment, or criminals on the run from the law.
on Nov 27, 2006
Hello All,

Child abuse and Neglect is such a horrible crime. I worked as a CPS Investigator for six years and was a CPS supervisor for two. I an tell you its a thankless job. Caseworkers are damned if they do and damned if they don't. Agencies are overwhelmed with cases, have severely limited resources, must spend so much time "accounting" for their time and actions that they have little time left to actually do the work.

Moreover, our society seems rather fickle about the whole thing, punishing rather than treating, re-enforcing aggression with aggression, and so on. And we would rather blame people than fund programs to assist them.

I remember one case where a man pulled out a handgun and told me, "no one's gonna tell me how to punish me child!" This, about a child whose arm was allegedly broken by the same man. I said to him, "you are right, but let me suggest a gun is not a good idea." We talked some more and I was able to find a way to get him to agree to see me.

None of us want "the government" in our homes. On the other hand, sometimes the "government" is the only authority who can get in those same homes to stop people from doing the harm they do because they are tired, stressed, overworked, overwhelmed or drunk.

Perhaps those who are sick of this stuff might consider doing something about it? Perhaps volunteering? Perhaps become an emergency foster care home? Perhaps hosting a Parents Anonymous group?

I don't know. I do know this "problem" is not going away and all of those tired, tried and true truisms people toss out don't do much of anything.

Be well.
on Nov 29, 2006
None of us want "the government" in our homes. On the other hand, sometimes the "government" is the only authority who can get in those same homes to stop people from doing the harm they do because they are tired, stressed, overworked, overwhelmed or drunk.


Not only do we not want the government in our homes, sodaiho, but you're simply not welcome without a warrant in mine. That is the way it is.

Our system is set up to allow people to abuse it by lodging anonymous calls against people they happen to dislike. And they exploit it all the time. In fact, a high number of cps calls are divorce disputes.

These anonymous calls waste the time and efforts of CPS investigators who can and should have the time to deal with SERIOUS cases of abuse/neglect. Not to mention, ironically, the actions of the accuser are a form of abuse themselves. We need to a) cease anonymous investigations ENTIRELY, and aggressively prosecute provably false reports.

Yes, CPS workers are overworked, sodaiho. Yes, it is a thankless job. But if CPS workers would work WITH people who lodge fair, well documented criticisms of the agency instead of seeing them as the enemy, they can and should work with them to eliminate these spurious complaints so they can get to the real issues.

In our case, two false reports in just over two years have tied up the time of the CPS investigator. The key allegation of this last report was provably false the minute the case worker came to our house; the accuser stated that I lock my wife up, yet when the CPS worker arrived, lo and behold that same wife answered the door. I was nowhere around at the time.

Personally, I won't volunteer with CPS. I won't work in any capacity that advocates FOR this system. I've seen too many stories of CPS abuse. Where I'm focusing my efforts are in ways to intervene to help keep the children home while recognizing legitimate concerns, and at the same time maintaining the civil rights of the parents.
on Nov 30, 2006
Hello Gideon,

I agree with you on the points regarding false reports and there are laws to assist with this. A person who makes a false or malicious report to CPS can be charged and proscecuted. They are also open to civil charges, as well.
What would you have CPS do when a report of abuse is made? They must follow up, make calls, visit, etc. When people loaded for bear against govern,ment intrusion in tyheir lives (for good reason, sometimes) then confront a CPS person with hostility, that hostility is noted and can be added to the investigotory picture.

Your arguement should not be withthose charged with investigating, but rather with those who make these false claims.

Be well.
on Nov 30, 2006
A person who makes a false or malicious report to CPS can be charged and proscecuted. They are also open to civil charges, as well.


They never are, sodaiho. That's the point. Because their reports are anonymous, the victims of their activities don't have the evidence needed to press charges.

If someone's not willing to put their name to a report, the CPS workers shouldn't take it. There SHOULD be a shield law to protect minors who report abusive parents from repurcussions, but in America, as unpopular as it is, we have a right to face our accusers, and we can't face an anonymous accuser.

When people loaded for bear against govern,ment intrusion in tyheir lives (for good reason, sometimes) then confront a CPS person with hostility, that hostility is noted and can be added to the investigotory picture.


Hmm, sodaiho. And herein lies the glaring contradiction of the liberal. You don't want to see NSA wiretaps of alleged terrorists, but you're willing to defend the actions of CPS workers who equally violate the Constitution.

My beef is with CPS because CPS does not even ATTEMPT to obey the Constitution. Because CPS investigates pretty clearly false claims routinely. Because CPS routinely removes children from their homes simply because the family was poor. Because CPS investigations lead to criminal charges in only 3% of their investigations, yet 44% of the children will never be returned home. Because CPS steals the childhood of children by placing them in "foster farms" and treating them like cattle.

I know more about the feelings of children hurt by these investigations than you do, sodaiho. I guarantee it. Because I WAS one.